Could Not Be The “Collective Intelligence” Of A SMART CITY Directly-Sensed To The Today-Dramatically Post-Kantian “ETERNAL PEACE”?

Abstract

The rhetoric inquiry from the title of this co-authored study is bordering four constructs-nuclei regarding which the co-authors are trying to model an ideal and, respectively, a (hypothetical-)real causal network [so, the next stage from a semantic network]. These modeling approaches are related to the dual cases of the * technological advance (contemporary, mostly, an exponential e-advance) / and respectively of the ** worldwide ‘subtle’ statistical www-images/popular culture self-interrogations/mass-media records. But the study does not firmly follow this deterministic quasi-statistically based trend (that would be suited for a ‘brighter-and-smarter’ nexus as SIPRI), i.e., caused mainly by the ‘absence’ of data related to the populations of Smart Cities comparatively to the actual worldwide Metropolis [suffocated by pollution, traffic, needed larger-and-diversified (e-)work basins, (e-)health need and its current troubles/assurances, e-dreams/e-leisure, etc.]. For example, is New York a smart city? If partially YES, then ‘Are the members of a respective Smart-Segment in the Metropolis interested in an “Eternal Peace” on our Entire Planet? – or are they fuzzy-neutral within the existent ‘locally assured’ peaceful stance?

Thus, this study aggregates a content and form of a MEMORANDUM – addressed to ‘whom it may concern’ – wordwide universities and research entities, engaged in ‘to change’ the current ‘war-peace-war’ stance…

Into this cognitive and praxis-actional context, the co-authored study is bordering [beyond the respective four-entitled constructs-nuclei] by an elicited triad of a set of constructs-tensions [in the Prologue: 6 + 12; in the (Central) Nucleus Part: 19; in the Ephilogue:  8]. These emerged constructs-tensions would pave (if these would be taken up by societal projects) the still possible evolutions from the contemporary Knowledge Society towards a Consciousness Society [the ‘Consciousness Society’ last evoked construct was firstly e-initiated by the Academician Mihai Dragãnescu / approx. 2005]. Now, this triad of a set of  18 + 19 + 8 constructs-tensions stands mainly as a subtle societal radiant-inquiry in front of the contemporary {e-education, e-governance/e-administration, e-liberties, e-prosecution…}, and it is just tending to propose harmonic steps-by-steps to change/revise/evolve the current wordwide ‘war-peace-war’ stance; the Smart Cities’s roles are essential to resonate, or not, to each of these 45 constructs-tensions. Our ‘Individual and Collective Intelligence’ will pave the course of these  constructs-tensions within the flow of the respective ‘subtle societal radiant-inquiry’.

E.g. (an element of this subtle societal radiant-inquiry) “Where are the HUMANS?”

All these are representing and emulating an address to universities / research entities in approaching/initiating an “Interdisciplinary Center of PEACE ENTREPRENEURS - PROGRESS ENTREPRENEURS versus our (RE-)HUMANIZATION”.