Would The Smart Cities’ Entities Be More Systemically-And-Indicatorial Comparatively Self-Asserted By The Respective Previous/Current Cities-Focused-Evolution?
Keywords:
Researching, Teaching, Learning, within-by-towards, INDICATORIAL EVOLUTION, UNKNOWN INDICATORIAL EVOLUTIONs, INFORMATION/KNOWLEDGE, CONTROL OURSELVES by ELICITING OURSELVES, WHAT WERE WE MADE FOR?, UNKNOWN FRIENDAbstract
The rhetoric inquiry from the title of this co-authored study does not firmly follow a deterministic quasi-statistically based trend (that would be suited for a ‘brighter-and-smarter’ nexus as the National Statistic Centers); i.e. caused mostly by the ‘absence’ of related data to the cohorts-populations of Smart Cities comparatively to the actual worldwide Metropolis. E.g. Is New York a Smart City? If partially-YES, then ‘Are the members of a respective Smart-Segment in the Metropolis interested/informed by an INDICATORIAL EVOLUTION from the PREVIOUS CITY – INDICATORIAL-ENTITIES to the New York Smart City’s RECENT INDICATORIAL-ENTITIES’? Or, have the New Yorkers fuzzy-indifference related to the existent ‘local asserted’ stance and/or related to the near future existent ‘Indicatorial Comparatively asserted’ stance?
Indifferent of the situation -but considering that the INDICATORIAL EVOLUTION is somehow asserted- then, it stands up a great-new COGNITIVE and PRAXIS-ACTIONAL context, and let the COMPARISONs effect to be open. Would all these influences, at least, to the LEADERSIP of the respective Smart City? I.e. {other plans/ programs; other objectives; other experts/other positions-jobs; other city-style; ‘originality’ …}!?!
But it is possible that, also, some segments of population to be SUBTLE INFLUENCED too – and to appear SMART CITIZENSHIP’S (RE-)ACTIONS – more or less significant into the large Smart City’s life and adapted/changed management for a rational improved (re-)action versus these COMPARISONs / new type of smart-citadin data... / unexpected new types of city-style and ‘originality’ / …
Each line of this INDICATORIAL EVOLUTION must be on an EQUIVALENT SUITABLE BASIS FOR A COMPARISON: e.g. at a comparatively equivalent set of population – e.g. per 100,000 PREVIOUS CITIZENS versus an equivalent (possible more than) 100,000+ CURRENT CITIZENS.
This co-authored study is bordering a set of CONSTRUCTS-TENSIONS of a still possible INDICATORIAL EVOLUTION (ASCEND / STATIONARITY / DESCEND) per each ‘new’ SURVEY – i.e. evolutions from the CONTEMPORARY KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY towards a SMART CITY SOCIETY. Is this ‘last stage’ a facete of a CONSCIOUSNESS SOCIETY – or ‘fuzzy not yet’? If ‘not’, then ‘When and how would it be’?
So, here and now, it is bordering the following set of INDICATORs for/towards: per 100,000 PREVIOUS/CURRENT CITIZENS the numeric data on: {Cybernetic Criminality / ‘Classical’ Criminality // Level of (e-)Education/Abandon/Illiteracy/(e-)Books Reading // Level of Happiness/Alienation / Active-Reactive Evolving Knowledge / Knowledge Usefulness at the Jobs Finding/Changing / Emigration/Immigration // Specific Level of Diversity / Genders-balance multi-ratio / Changed Sex // Marriages/Divorces/Separations // Level for Problematic-Childhoods // Problematic-Health --- mostly Depressions // Levels of (e-)Liberty/Prosecution // Levels of (e-)Administration // Levels of (e-)Peace-role …}.
